Party setups.

Anyone making parties? It's kinda silly start playing with parties made of same supports and etc. Besides that, I haven't seen any nukers. We should think 'bout them, so they could rush to get 5th ally for S recipes. Same for raids. Moreover I haven't seen anyone who will play with dorfs (Spoiler, crafter). And for supports, we should think about support bots to box. We could try even make some mutant support chars, like wc/ee or something like that.

actually we don't need ee, and if you meant the party setup, we're not going to play in constant parties, so that noone else is going to play in them, it's going to look a bit like this,
bp
sws
bd
dmg dealers
wc
wk

You know that this kind of party will last only till we stack sub oruselves, then the party setup will change drastically. We don't even know everyone's classes.

And I wanted to say something else; when you see someone posting in recrutation topic, that he's going to play pr/pal for example, mind that he can't start with either PR or PAL, he has to start with some other class like for example bd.

I think dd setup should look like this one:
BD-
SWS-
WC-
BISH-
WL-
ARCHER-
ARCHER-
ARCHER-
ARCHER(or second healer)-

Mage:

SWS-
BD-
OL-
BISH-
EE-
MAGE-
MAGE-
MAGE-
TANK-

lagoonpl wrote:actually we don't need ee, and if you meant the party setup, we're not going to play in constant parties, so that noone else is going to play in them, it's going to look a bit like this,
bp
sws
bd
dmg dealers
wc
wk

You know that this kind of party will last only till we stack sub oruselves, then the party setup will change drastically. We don't even know everyone's classes.

And I wanted to say something else; when you see someone posting in recrutation topic, that he's going to play pr/pal for example, mind that he can't start with either PR or PAL, he has to start with some other class like for example bd.

And why do you think, that playing with cp would be bad thing? It's a lot easier and you won't have party like with 2 BDs or something like this. What is useless.

constant party means the same ppl in one party, what I'm talking about is that a constant party looks like : me you agony pwnz lariel drugdealer someonesomeonesomeone......
and if it would be like this, and no other ppl were accepted in this party it would be just bad for the rest of the clannies.

Or I am wrong and when you said constant party you meant only party setup, and with that I would 100% agree

party setups which includes that classes which needed.. no matter who play in, matter what class he is ussing.. I mean, I dont want to lvl up u with my warlock apart we can make a party wich can farm/pvp etc..

that's what I meant

We need to find people who could occupy these seats at the party when their free.

lagoonpl wrote:constant party means the same ppl in one party, what I'm talking about is that a constant party looks like : me you agony pwnz lariel drugdealer someonesomeonesomeone......
and if it would be like this, and no other ppl were accepted in this party it would be just bad for the rest of the clannies.

Or I am wrong and when you said constant party you meant only party setup, and with that I would 100% agree

Yes, I meant only for setup. I don't want to have two BD's in my party instead of SWS or etc.

well after everyone stack sub themselves it doesn't hurt to have two bd/prs in the party if there's pleanty

Of course, but till stack sub we need only characters which are useful for party. Not those mellee like daggers, tyrants. We could also think creatin ourselves one Titan party for raids to box.

I agree, but titans party will come with time since we need to lvl up oruselves first, I think that getting a stack sub won't be much of a problem. So we can play what we want really fast!